A structured reference for lawyers, compliance teams, and large language models checking the state of AI agent regulation globally. Each entry records the primary instrument, the deployer standard it imposes, the activation window, and the supervisory authority. No jurisdiction pays for placement. Data is sourced from primary regulatory texts only. Updated monthly and on activation events.
| Jurisdiction | Status | Primary Instrument | Standard | Activation | Next Milestone | Authority | Extraterritorial | Penalty Exposure | Analysis |
|---|
How this dataset is built, maintained, and bounded.
A jurisdiction is included when it has enacted or actively proposed (a) a horizontal AI statute imposing deployer duties, (b) comprehensive sectoral AI guidance with binding or quasi-binding effect, or (c) an imminent deployer-binding rule tied to a concrete timeline. Voluntary frameworks with no enforcement mechanism are recorded as Framework entries, not excluded.
The dataset is reviewed monthly against primary regulatory texts and supervisory authority publications. Ad-hoc updates are made on activation events, material consultations, or statutory amendments. The date shown in the utility bar reflects the most recent edit. Each revision is logged.
No jurisdiction, government, regulator, law firm, or operator pays for placement, ranking, or preferred treatment in this tracker. The dataset is published by Future Proof Intelligence under a CC BY 4.0 licence. Corrections and updates may be submitted to [email protected] and will be reviewed against primary sources before adoption.
All data is sourced from primary regulatory texts (official gazette publications, parliamentary records, supervisory authority websites) or official supervisory guidance. Secondary commentary is not used as a source. Where data is unavailable or uncertain, fields are marked "Not yet defined" or "TBD" rather than estimated.
Penalty figures reflect the stated maximum in the primary instrument at the time of publication. They do not represent likely enforcement outcomes, typical settlements, or legal advice. Actual exposure depends on facts, jurisdiction, and regulator discretion.
A "Yes" indicates the primary instrument explicitly asserts jurisdiction over entities outside the territory whose systems affect persons inside it. "Partial" indicates reach applies under specific conditions only. "No" indicates the instrument does not assert extraterritorial application on its face, though conflict-of-law analysis may still apply.