The briefing. When the law moves.
One short email when AI agent law moves somewhere we track: what changed, in which jurisdiction, and the source it rests on. Each item follows the same editorial standard as the articles on this site, with named sources, cited documents and dated events.
Start here. Five cornerstone pieces.
If you are new to the desk, these set out the ground the rest of our writing builds on. Read our editorial standards for how we work.
- US, EU, UK. Three approaches to the same question.How the US, the EU and the UK allocate responsibility across the AI supply chain: horizontal statute, revised products regime, and sector regulators, side by side.
- When the EU AI Act applies to US and UK companiesThe extraterritorial reach of the EU AI Act: when US and UK companies fall inside the regime, and what the operator duties require of them.
- The Colorado AI Act. Deployer obligations under SB 24-205.The duty of care, the algorithmic discrimination standard, the risk management programme, and the comparison with the EU AI Act.
- NIST AI RMF and the emerging US standard of reasonable careWhy a voluntary federal framework has become the benchmark courts, regulators and contracts use to judge whether an operator acted reasonably.
- Asia Pacific AI governance. The 2026 landscape.Singapore's AI Verify, Japan's AI Promotion Act, Korea's AI Basic Act, and why the region's softer law approach sets standards many deployers follow.