There is no single international framework governing AI agent deployment. An organisation placing agents across multiple markets in 2026 holds concurrent obligations under the EU AI Act, the Colorado AI Act, the UK's sectoral approach, and a growing set of Asia-Pacific frameworks. This hub collects every analysis and tool this publication has produced on that patchwork. Articles are organised by jurisdiction and by the comparative questions that arise when multiple regimes apply at once.
When multiple regimes apply simultaneously, understanding how they align and where they conflict is the starting point for a deployment strategy. These articles address the comparison directly.
A structured comparison of how the US, EU, and UK are allocating responsibility across the AI supply chain in 2026. Horizontal statute, revised products regime, and sectoral regulator leadership examined side by side.
A 2026 guide to the extraterritorial reach of the EU AI Act. The conditions under which US and UK companies fall inside the regime, and what the operator duties require of them.
The US does not have a single federal AI liability statute. Liability is shaped by the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, state statutes led by Colorado, and sector-specific regulator guidance. These articles map the US position in 2026.
A close reading of the Colorado AI Act as it enters force on 1 February 2026. The duty of care, the algorithmic discrimination standard, the risk management programme, and the comparison with the EU AI Act.
Why a voluntary federal framework is becoming the benchmark courts, regulators, and contracts use to define whether an operator acted reasonably when deploying an autonomous AI agent.
Singapore's AI Verify, Japan's AI Promotion Act, and Korea's AI Basic Act represent distinct national approaches that together establish de facto regional standards. This article maps the 2026 landscape.
Singapore's AI Verify, Japan's AI Promotion Act, Korea's AI Basic Act, and why the region's softer-law approach is setting de facto standards many US and EU deployers will follow.
The Global AI Regulatory Tracker lets deployers filter, sort, and compare active frameworks across seventeen jurisdictions. Activation dates, penalty exposure, and extraterritorial reach in one interactive table.
Filter and compare AI regulation across seventeen jurisdictions including the EU, US states, UK, Singapore, Korea, China, and the Council of Europe framework. Activation dates, penalty exposure, and extraterritorial reach in one interactive table.
The full list of compliance and reference tools published by this desk. Updated as new tools are released ahead of the 2026 activation windows.